the in-between
The money that won't sit still
An open account after an exit starts to feel like a problem demanding a solution.
The wire cleared on a Tuesday. You looked at the number in your account longer than you want to admit, and somewhere in that afternoon the feeling changed. It stopped being a reward and started being a task. The money was just sitting there, and sitting there felt wrong.
By Friday you have three calls booked. A friend's fund that is almost closed. A founder who reminds you of yourself at that age. A wealth manager with a very calm voice and a very confident deck. Everyone agrees on one thing without quite saying it: money this size should be doing something.
Here is the noise. When you ran a company, idle capital was a failure. Cash that was not working was cash you had to answer for. That instinct kept you sharp for twenty years, and now it has followed you out the door and turned itself on the one account it should leave alone. The pressure you feel is not really coming from the fund or the founder. It is coming from an old reflex that says a person like you does not just let money sit.
So you start looking for somewhere to put it, fast, and the speed feels like decisiveness. It usually is not.
Let me offer a different frame. The urge to deploy the money quickly is rarely about the money. It is about you. An open account is a stand-in for an open calendar, and both are asking the same uncomfortable question: what do you actually want to do now. Writing a check answers a smaller, easier question instead. It lets you feel productive while you avoid the harder, unpaid work of figuring out the next thing. The check is motion. Motion is not the same as direction, and right now it is very easy to confuse the two.
There is a quieter truth under this. Taleb's word for it is optionality. Money you have not committed is not doing nothing. It is holding every door open. The moment you deploy it, most of those doors close, and you have traded a wide field of choices for the feeling of having acted. In the in-between, that is a bad trade. You would be choosing while you are the least sure you will ever be, under a pressure you have mistaken for opportunity.
None of this means be timid with your money forever. It means notice that the clock you are hearing is one you wound yourself. The founder's round will raise again. The fund will have another vintage. Almost nothing that is genuinely good for you disappears because you waited a season to think.
So here is the small thing, and it costs you almost nothing.
Put the money somewhere boring on purpose, and give yourself one rule: no check over a size that would sting goes out for ninety days. Not never. Ninety days. Then, sometime this week, write one page for yourself, by hand if you can, answering a single question: if I could not invest a dollar for a year, what would I do with my time instead. Do not show it to anyone. Do not act on it. Just find out whether the restlessness is really about the money, or about the empty space the money is trying to fill.
If the honest answer surprises you, that is the point. The account can wait. The question cannot.
Mark